How much does your chip cost to manufacture?
A provenance-backed data platform for semiconductor & AI-accelerator economics — wafer pricing, HBM, packaging, fabs, and foundry allocation. Every number dated and sourced, every dataset queryable by humans and AI agents alike.
TSMC wafer price by node
Public sourcesAnalysis & Modeling Tools
From wafer-level cost modeling to global supply chain mapping — everything in one platform.
Chip Price Calculator
Wafer cost, yield modeling, packaging economics, and margin analysis across process nodes from 180nm to 2nm.
HBM Market Analysis
HBM market dynamics — accelerator specs, vendor market share, spot pricing, supply chain signals, and revenue forecasts.
Fab Explorer
Explore 64 semiconductor fabs from TSMC, Samsung, Intel, GlobalFoundries, SMIC, UMC, and more. Filter by node, country, and capacity.
Market Data
Historical time series for wafer pricing, HBM/DRAM costs, fab utilization, CoWoS capacity, and NRE trends — 321 sourced data points across 16 datasets.
Cost Bridge Chart
Side-by-side manufacturing cost comparison across logic die, HBM memory, packaging, and assembly for 13 AI accelerators.
Packaging Model
Compare CoWoS-S, CoWoS-L, EMIB, SoIC, and flip-chip architectures with HBM stack cost analysis.
Supply Chain Explorer
Interactive sunburst visualization of semiconductor supply chain chokepoints — from ASML to Zeiss optics to Japanese photoresist monopolies.
Price / Performance Frontier
Compare AI accelerators on cost, throughput, training time, and TCO — H100, B200, MI300X, TPU v5p, and more.
Allocation Dashboard
Track foundry allocation status, CoWoS packaging availability, and HBM supply signals across 14 process nodes from TSMC, Samsung, Intel, and more.
Tapeout Decision Workspace
Guided 5-step workflow for fabless teams evaluating tapeout decisions — chip definition, foundry selection, cost modeling, competitive benchmarking, and go/no-go summary.
Developer API
Structured semiconductor data for AI agents and applications — accelerator costs, HBM market data, and 30+ articles. Free, no key required.
The AI-chip supply chain, one email a week
One short email a week on the AI-chip supply chain — pricing & lead-time signals, HBM and foundry-capacity moves, and that week's new analysis. Sourced, dated, human-reviewed. No marketing, ever.
One short email a week — only when the data moves. No marketing, ever. One-click unsubscribe.
Latest Analysis & Market Intelligence
Deep-dive reports and daily AI-detected supply-chain signals — each sourced and dated. Public sources only.
HBM4 Mass Production Race Accelerates: SK Hynix Leads, Samsung Surges, Supply Locked Through 2026 Amid ~$950B Deal Wave
SK Hynix commenced HBM4 mass production in Q2 2026 with yield stability described as 'approaching mature-generation levels,' while Samsung guided Q3 2026 HBM4 revenue at 3x Q2 levels and targeted parity with its overall DRAM market share in HBM by H2 2026; both vendors confirmed HBM4E sample shipments are underway for 2027 qualification cycles. Against a backdrop of fully sold-out HBM capacity across all three major suppliers through 2026, South Korean vendors locked in AI chip supply agreements through 2030 via a reported ~$950 billion US deal package, with SK Hynix also signing a confirmed multi-year technology partnership with Nvidia specifically for next-generation AI memory.
HBM supply sold out through 2026 across SK Hynix, Samsung, Micron; Samsung targeting ~50% HBM capacity increase by end-2026; SK Hynix infrastructure investment >4x prior guidance; Samsung cumulative semiconductor CapEx ~$73B (100 trillion KRW) through 2026; SK Hynix Q2 2026 operating margin hit record 76%; DRAM prices +30% Q-o-Q in Q2 2026; UBS forecasts Samsung HBM bit-share at 41% vs. SK Hynix 39% in 2027 (source: UBS, denominator: HBM bit shipments); SK Hynix M15X (Cheongju) production pull-forward to mid-2027; Samsung P5 Pyeongtaek online by 2028; Yongin Fab 1 cleanroom open early 2027.
Nvidia–SK Hynix Multi-Year HBM Supply Partnership Confirmed at Up to $500B
Nvidia has secured a long-term HBM memory supply agreement with SK Hynix reported at up to $500 billion, encompassing next-generation HBM development for AI training, agents, and physical AI workloads, alongside a planned 2GW data center initiative for 2027. The deal, reported by CNBC and corroborated by The Economic Times via Facebook, represents the largest publicly disclosed memory supply commitment in the semiconductor industry and effectively locks in a dominant share of SK Hynix's HBM output for Nvidia's accelerator roadmap.
Supply commitment: up to $500B multi-year; Capacity: SK Hynix HBM allocation heavily directed toward Nvidia; Lead time risk for non-Nvidia HBM buyers: elevated (magnitude unquantified in sources).
Nvidia-SK Hynix & Samsung-Broadcom Lock In $950B HBM Supply Agreements, Securing Next-Gen Memory Pipeline Through 2030
Nvidia and SK Group have announced a $500B+ strategic initiative that includes a long-term HBM supply partnership with SK Hynix covering HBM4 memory for Vera Rubin-generation AI accelerators, with first AI data center deployment targeted for 2027; separately, Samsung Electronics signed a $200B collaboration with Broadcom spanning memory, foundry, and advanced packaging through 2030. Combined, South Korea's presidential adviser confirmed the two Korean memory giants have committed to $950B in memory supply partnerships with U.S. big tech — $750B from SK Hynix and $200B from Samsung — representing the most significant multi-year HBM supply lock-in ever disclosed publicly.
SK Hynix: $750B long-term HBM supply commitment to U.S. customers (led by Nvidia); Samsung: $200B memory + foundry + packaging commitment to Broadcom through 2030; SK Telecom 2GW AI data center powered by HBM4 targeting 2027 online date; TSMC CoWoS and advanced packaging capacity described as largely booked through 2027.
The Fourth Input: Why Labor Is Now the Binding Constraint on AI Data Center Deployment
Skilled labor shortages — not silicon, power, or capital — are emerging as the decisive pacing variable for AI data center deployment in 2026. This analysis examines the structural gap, its CAPEX productivity implications, and what procurement and strategy teams should do now.
The semiconductor and hyperscaler industries have spent three years optimizing chip supply chains, packaging throughput, and power procurement — only to run into a constraint that no foundry can fab its way around: trained human beings. Labor shortages across construction, electrical, and data center integration disciplines are now slowing deployment at a scale that directly erodes CAPEX productivity, with an estimated 30–50% of planned 2026 AI data center capacity projected to slip into 2028.
Memory Cost Headwinds and the 2026 PC Shipment Contraction: What OEMs, Procurement Teams, and Enterprise Buyers Need to Know
Surging DRAM and NAND prices driven by AI datacenter demand are compressing OEM margins and accelerating a broad-based PC shipment decline in 2026. This analysis examines the structural mechanics, segment-level exposure, and strategic implications for corporate buyers and supply-chain teams.
The 2026 PC market contraction is not a standard demand-side correction — it is a supply-side repricing event rooted in a permanent reallocation of DRAM and NAND capacity toward AI infrastructure. Budget laptop economics are under the most acute pressure, with per-unit memory cost increases of $90–$165 since early 2025 eliminating the margin buffer that made entry-level configurations viable. Corporate procurement teams should anticipate constrained SKU availability, longer device lifecycles, and structurally higher refresh costs through at least 2027.
Silicon Analysts Pro
Custom cost models, data exports, price alerts, and exclusive analysis for semiconductor professionals.
Pro is coming soon — get notified when it launches.
Learn More →Free to join the waitlist — no credit card required.
Semiconductor Cost Modeling Platform
Chip Cost Calculator
Model chip manufacturing costs across process nodes from 28nm to 2nm. Calculate GDPW, net die yield, wafer costs, CoWoS packaging, HBM memory pricing, and total chip cost with interactive parameter adjustments. Free alternative to paid die calculators.
Supply Chain Intelligence
Explore 64 semiconductor fabs worldwide with capacity data, track HBM market dynamics with live spot pricing and vendor market share, and visualize supply chain chokepoints from ASML lithography to Japanese photoresist monopolies.
Market Analysis
30+ deep-dive reports covering TSMC wafer pricing, NVIDIA GPU economics, HBM memory shortages, export controls, and AI chip demand trends. Data-driven analysis with interactive cost models and structured data via our free API.
Semiconductor Manufacturing FAQ
- How much does it cost to make a semiconductor chip?
- Semiconductor manufacturing costs vary by process node: mature 28nm costs ~$3,000 per wafer, advanced 5nm costs ~$18,500, and cutting-edge 3nm costs ~$19,500. Per-chip cost depends on die size and yield — for example, an NVIDIA H100 (814mm² at TSMC 4N) costs approximately $3,320 to manufacture, while the B200 costs approximately $6,400.
- How many chips can you get from one wafer?
- The number of chips per wafer (Gross Dies Per Wafer or GDPW) depends on die size and wafer diameter. On a standard 300mm wafer: a small chip (50mm²) yields ~1,250 gross dies, a medium chip (200mm²) yields ~300, and a large chip like NVIDIA's H100 (814mm²) yields approximately 74 gross dies before yield loss.
- What is the most expensive chip to manufacture?
- As of 2026, the most expensive chips to manufacture are large AI accelerators. NVIDIA's B200 (Blackwell) at TSMC 4NP has an estimated manufacturing cost of ~$6,400, with HBM memory ($2,900) being the largest cost component. AMD's MI300X, using N5/N6 chiplets with advanced packaging, costs approximately $5,300 to manufacture.
- How many semiconductor fabs are there in the world?
- Silicon Analysts tracks 64 semiconductor fabrication facilities across 10 countries, operated by 16 companies including TSMC, Samsung, Intel, GlobalFoundries, UMC, and SMIC. New fabs are currently under construction or announced globally, including TSMC Arizona, JASM Kumamoto, and Intel Ohio.
Start analyzing semiconductor costs today
No sign-up required. Open tools, open data, open API.