How much does your chip cost to manufacture?
A provenance-backed data platform for semiconductor & AI-accelerator economics — wafer pricing, HBM, packaging, fabs, and foundry allocation. Every number dated and sourced, every dataset queryable by humans and AI agents alike.
TSMC wafer price by node
Public sourcesAnalysis & Modeling Tools
From wafer-level cost modeling to global supply chain mapping — everything in one platform.
Chip Price Calculator
Wafer cost, yield modeling, packaging economics, and margin analysis across process nodes from 180nm to 2nm.
HBM Market Analysis
HBM market dynamics — accelerator specs, vendor market share, spot pricing, supply chain signals, and revenue forecasts.
Fab Explorer
Explore 64 semiconductor fabs from TSMC, Samsung, Intel, GlobalFoundries, SMIC, UMC, and more. Filter by node, country, and capacity.
Market Data
Historical time series for wafer pricing, HBM/DRAM costs, fab utilization, CoWoS capacity, and NRE trends — 328 sourced data points across 16 datasets.
Cost Bridge Chart
Side-by-side manufacturing cost comparison across logic die, HBM memory, packaging, and assembly for 18 AI accelerators.
Packaging Model
Compare CoWoS-S, CoWoS-L, EMIB, SoIC, and flip-chip architectures with HBM stack cost analysis.
Supply Chain Explorer
Interactive sunburst visualization of semiconductor supply chain chokepoints — from ASML to Zeiss optics to Japanese photoresist monopolies.
Price / Performance Frontier
Compare AI accelerators on cost, throughput, training time, and TCO — H100, B200, MI300X, TPU v5p, and more.
Allocation Dashboard
Track foundry allocation status, CoWoS packaging availability, and HBM supply signals across 14 process nodes from TSMC, Samsung, Intel, and more.
Tapeout Decision Workspace
Guided 5-step workflow for fabless teams evaluating tapeout decisions — chip definition, foundry selection, cost modeling, competitive benchmarking, and go/no-go summary.
Developer API
Structured semiconductor data for AI agents and applications — accelerator costs, HBM market data, and 30+ articles. Free, no key required.
The AI-chip supply chain, one email a week
One short email a week on the AI-chip supply chain — pricing & lead-time signals, HBM and foundry-capacity moves, and that week's new analysis. Sourced, dated, human-reviewed. No marketing, ever.
One short email a week — only when the data moves. No marketing, ever. One-click unsubscribe.
Latest Analysis & Market Intelligence
Deep-dive reports and daily AI-detected supply-chain signals — each sourced and dated. Public sources only.
TSMC CoWoS 5.5x Reticle Hits 98-99% Yield in Volume Production; 14x Roadmap Confirmed to 2029
TSMC disclosed at the 2026 OCP APAC Summit that its 5.5x reticle-size CoWoS is now in volume production with yields consistently above 98% and reaching 99% across multiple AI customer products — a strong positive signal for advanced packaging supply stability. The company additionally confirmed a technology roadmap extending to 14x reticle-size CoWoS by 2029 and a SoIC hybrid bonding pitch reduction to 4.5 microns, signaling sustained multi-year capacity and capability expansion for AI accelerator packaging.
Yield: CoWoS 5.5x reticle confirmed at 98-99% in volume production (positive); Roadmap: 14x reticle-size CoWoS targeted by 2029; SoIC pitch: 6 microns currently in HVM, targeting 4.5 microns by 2029.
TSMC CoWoS Yield Confirmed at 98-99% in HVM; Nvidia Weighs 8-Stack HBM4E Fallback for Rubin Ultra
TSMC disclosed at the 2026 OCP APAC Summit that its 5.5x reticle CoWoS packaging is sustaining yields of 98-99% across multiple AI customer products already in high-volume manufacturing, with a roadmap to 14x reticle size by 2029 — a landmark yield validation that materially de-risks CoWoS supply for H200/B100-class accelerators. Concurrently, Korean press reports that Nvidia is evaluating a downgrade from 12-stack HBM4E to 8-stack HBM4E for its next-generation Rubin Ultra accelerator, citing Samsung and SK Hynix high-stack yield constraints — a signal that HBM stacking yield remains a live bottleneck gating the next product cycle.
CoWoS yield: 98-99% confirmed in HVM (positive); HBM4E 12-stack yield risk flagged — potential stack-count reduction from 12 to 8 layers (est. HBM capacity-per-die reduction of ~33% if downgrade confirmed); TSMC 2026 CapEx raised to $60-64B record (capacity positive).
Samsung HBM4 Hits 80% 'Golden Yield' — Four Months Ahead of Schedule, Supply Tightness Set to Ease
Samsung Electronics' HBM4 yield rate has reached approximately 80% — the industry-standard 'golden yield' threshold for mass-production maturity — roughly four months ahead of original internal targets, having started at below 60% at the February 2026 production launch. Corroborating Korean-language reporting (Seoul Economy, Nate News) and English-language trade coverage (Dataconomy, BigGo Finance) confirm the milestone, with Samsung now accelerating HBM4E ramp targeting a 70% yield before a planned H1 2027 launch; industry sources also note SK Hynix's HBM4 yield has independently reached the 80% band, meaning both leading suppliers have simultaneously achieved mass-production maturity on the sixth-generation node.
Yield improvement: Samsung HBM4 from <60% (Feb 2026 launch) to ~80% (Aug 2026) — approx. +20 pp in ~6 months; SK Hynix HBM4 yield also reported at ~80%; HBM4E target set at 70% pre-launch (H1 2027). 2027 HBM supply for all three vendors reported as fully booked.
ASML Pricing Power and EUV Economics: How Lithography TCO Is Reshaping Fab Capex Strategy
ASML's monopoly on EUV lithography gives it structural pricing power that reverberates through every advanced wafer cost. This analysis examines EUV cost-per-wafer economics, the fab capex burden of High-NA adoption, and what it means for memory and logic fabs in 2026.
ASML's unchallenged EUV monopoly means lithography tool pricing is effectively a cost floor for any fab operating at leading-edge nodes, and that floor is rising. With EUV tools running $200M–$400M per unit and High-NA machines expected to carry even higher initial margins before supply chains mature, the lithography TCO embedded in every advanced wafer is becoming one of the most consequential — and least negotiable — line items in semiconductor manufacturing economics. Procurement teams and strategic planners who treat wafer pricing as a foundry negotiation problem are missing the upstream constraint that is actually setting the floor.
AMD Zen 6 Low-Power Cores: Architectural Stakes, Process Economics, and Intel's Narrowing Window
AMD's Zen 6 architecture introduces a three-tier core hierarchy — Performance, Efficiency, and a new LP class — that challenges Intel's E-core strategy on silicon economics and scheduler performance. This analysis examines the competitive, process, and procurement implications for corporate decision-makers.
AMD's Zen 6 LP core introduction signals a structural shift in heterogeneous CPU design philosophy, moving beyond the dual-tier P/E model Intel popularized. The node economics at TSMC N3/N4 create a cost pressure that favors AMD's chiplet disaggregation strategy, while Intel's monolithic Nova Lake architecture faces a widening cost-per-core gap that is difficult to close without a full foundry mix shift.
Silicon Analysts Pro
Custom cost models, data exports, full historical series, and exclusive analysis for semiconductor professionals.
Pro is coming soon — get notified when it launches.
Learn More →Free to join the waitlist — no credit card required.
Semiconductor Cost Modeling Platform
Chip Cost Calculator
Model chip manufacturing costs across process nodes from 28nm to 2nm. Calculate GDPW, net die yield, wafer costs, CoWoS packaging, HBM memory pricing, and total chip cost with interactive parameter adjustments. Free alternative to paid die calculators.
Supply Chain Intelligence
Explore 64 semiconductor fabs worldwide with capacity data, track HBM market dynamics with live spot pricing and vendor market share, and visualize supply chain chokepoints from ASML lithography to Japanese photoresist monopolies.
Market Analysis
30+ deep-dive reports covering TSMC wafer pricing, NVIDIA GPU economics, HBM memory shortages, export controls, and AI chip demand trends. Data-driven analysis with interactive cost models and structured data via our free API.
Semiconductor Manufacturing FAQ
- How much does it cost to make a semiconductor chip?
- Semiconductor manufacturing costs vary by process node: mature 28nm costs ~$3,000 per wafer, advanced 5nm costs ~$18,500, and cutting-edge 3nm costs ~$19,500. Per-chip cost depends on die size and yield — for example, an NVIDIA H100 (814mm² at TSMC 4N) costs approximately $3,320 to manufacture, while the B200 costs approximately $6,400.
- How many chips can you get from one wafer?
- The number of chips per wafer (Gross Dies Per Wafer or GDPW) depends on die size and wafer diameter. On a standard 300mm wafer: a small chip (50mm²) yields ~1,250 gross dies, a medium chip (200mm²) yields ~300, and a large chip like NVIDIA's H100 (814mm²) yields approximately 74 gross dies before yield loss.
- What is the most expensive chip to manufacture?
- As of 2026, the most expensive chips to manufacture are large AI accelerators. NVIDIA's B200 (Blackwell) at TSMC 4NP has an estimated manufacturing cost of ~$6,750, with HBM memory ($3,250) being the largest cost component. AMD's MI300X, using N5/N6 chiplets with advanced packaging, costs approximately $5,300 to manufacture.
- How many semiconductor fabs are there in the world?
- Silicon Analysts tracks 64 semiconductor fabrication facilities across 10 countries, operated by 16 companies including TSMC, Samsung, Intel, GlobalFoundries, UMC, and SMIC. New fabs are currently under construction or announced globally, including TSMC Arizona, JASM Kumamoto, and Intel Ohio.
Start analyzing semiconductor costs today
No sign-up required. Open tools, open data, open API.