Silicon Analysts Data API
Structured semiconductor data for AI agents, applications, and researchers. Free to use — no API key required for read endpoints.
Connect to AI Agents (MCP)
NewMCP (Model Context Protocol) lets AI assistants like Claude directly query Silicon Analysts data during conversations — no manual copy-paste needed. Ask about chip costs, wafer pricing, or supply chain trends and get live data in real time.
Connect to Claude Desktop
claude_desktop_config.json:{
"mcpServers": {
"silicon-analysts": {
"url": "https://siliconanalysts.com/api/mcp",
"headers": {
"Authorization": "Bearer sa_live_YOUR_API_KEY_HERE"
}
}
}
}Connect from Cursor, Windsurf, or any MCP client
The server speaks standard streamable-HTTP MCP at https://siliconanalysts.com/api/mcp, so any MCP-capable IDE or agent framework can query semiconductor economics in-editor. In Cursor: Settings → MCP → Add server. In Windsurf: mcp_config.json. Same config shape either way:
{
"mcpServers": {
"silicon-analysts": {
"url": "https://siliconanalysts.com/api/mcp",
"headers": { "Authorization": "Bearer sa_live_YOUR_API_KEY_HERE" }
}
}
}Anonymous access also works for current data (omit the header, ~20 req/24h per IP; history needs a free key) — see /for-agents for the no-signup path. LangChain / Vercel AI SDK users can point any MCP or plain-HTTP tool adapter at the same endpoint; every response carries meta.freshness so agents know when re-fetching pays off.
Available MCP Tools
| Tool | What it answers |
|---|---|
| get_accelerator_costs | AI chip specs, costs, and margins (13 chips) |
| calculate_chip_cost | Die dimensions → manufacturing cost estimate |
| estimate_lead_time | Mask layers + utilization → manufacturing cycle time (weeks) |
| get_hbm_market_data | HBM pricing, market share, and forecasts |
| get_market_pulse | Current supply chain signals and headlines |
| get_wafer_pricing | Wafer price ranges by process node |
| get_packaging_costs | Packaging costs and capabilities + HBM specs |
| get_hbm_qualification | HBM qualification matrix + status timeline per platform |
| get_foundry_allocation | Foundry capacity allocation snapshot by node |
| get_foundry_economics | Quarterly per-node wafer ASP + utilization from public IR |
| get_recent_changes | What changed in the data ledger (7d/30d window) |
| get_market_intelligence | Sourced semiconductor intelligence briefs |
| get_market_advantage | Vetted time-advantage evidence (coverage-race wins) |
| get_benchmark_history | Historical benchmark observations, as-of any date |
| get_fab_capacity | Fab-level capacity snapshots over time |
| get_forecasts | Third-party forecast vintages by original publication date |
| get_wfe_signals | WFE-maker order-book (ASML/AMAT/Lam/KLA/TEL) from IR |
| get_fab_events | Fab construction/ramp milestone log, delays included |
| get_policy_events | Trade-policy timeline anchored to government documents |
Example Prompts
After connecting, try asking Claude:
Integration Guides
Building agents on the Anthropic SDK, LangChain, or the Vercel AI SDK? Step-by-step guides with working code show how to wire up these MCP tools in minutes.
Quick Start
# Get all AI accelerator cost breakdowns
curl https://siliconanalysts.com/api/v1/accelerators
# Filter by vendor
curl "https://siliconanalysts.com/api/v1/accelerators?vendor=NVIDIA"
# Calculate chip cost (POST)
curl -X POST https://siliconanalysts.com/api/v1/calculate/chip-cost \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"dieWidth": 26, "dieHeight": 33, "processNode": "5nm"}'
# Get HBM market data
curl https://siliconanalysts.com/api/v1/hbm
# Search analysis articles
curl "https://siliconanalysts.com/api/v1/articles?q=tsmc&limit=5"Endpoints
/api/v1Lists all available endpoints, schemas, and usage terms. Start here for discovery.
Example Response
{
"name": "Silicon Analysts Data API",
"version": "1",
"endpoints": [ ... ],
"usage": { "tracking": "All requests logged" }
}/api/v1/usageYour own call history across REST + MCP: timestamp, endpoint/tool, redacted params, status, latency, payload size, request_id (matches the X-Request-Id response header), and trace_id when your client sent a W3C traceparent header. We echo traceparent/tracestate on every response and store the trace-id, so your security team can join our audit trail against your own distributed traces (leaf participant — no re-spanning). Requires an API key.
Query Parameters
window24h | 7d | 30d (default 7d)?window=7dlimitMax rows after merging both surfaces (1–2000)?limit=500beforeISO cursor: rows strictly older?before=2026-07-01T00:00:00ZExample Response
{
"success": true,
"data": { "usage": [{
"ts": "2026-07-05T10:12:03.412Z",
"surface": "mcp",
"target": "get_wafer_pricing",
"status": "success",
"latency_ms": 41, "response_bytes": 18234,
"request_id": "7f3c…", "trace_id": "4bf92f3577b34da6a3ce929d0e0e4736"
}] },
"meta": { "count": 1, "window": "7d", "note": "request_id ↔ X-Request-Id; trace_id ↔ your traceparent" }
}/api/v1/acceleratorsManufacturing cost data for 13 AI accelerators: NVIDIA H100, H200, B100, B200, GB200, AMD MI300X, MI355X, Intel Gaudi 3, Google TPU v5p, AWS Trainium 2, Microsoft Maia 100, Meta MTIA v2. Includes logic die, HBM, packaging, and test costs.
Query Parameters
vendorFilter by vendor (case-insensitive)?vendor=NVIDIAchipFilter by chip name (partial match, case-insensitive)?chip=H100fieldsReturn only specified fields (comma-separated)?fields=chip,estMfgCostUsdExample Response
{
"success": true,
"data": [{
"chip": "NVIDIA H100 SXM5",
"vendor": "NVIDIA",
"processNode": "TSMC 4N",
"estMfgCostUsd": 3320,
"estSellPriceUsd": 32500,
"chipGrossMarginPct": 87.5,
"costBreakdown": {
"logicDieCostUsd": 300,
"hbmCostUsd": 1350,
"packagingCostUsd": 750,
"testAssemblyCostUsd": 920
},
...
}],
"meta": {
"count": 13,
"source": "Silicon Analysts",
"freshness": {
"cadence": "Weekly — cost models recompute when inputs move (Monday refresh fleet)",
"next_refresh": "2026-07-06T12:30:00.000Z",
"delta_check": "https://siliconanalysts.com/api/v1/changes?window=7d — empty = nothing moved"
}
}
}/api/v1/hbmFull HBM market dataset with 10 data tables: accelerator specs, HBM generation specs, vendor market share, spot prices, leading indicators, qualification feed, revenue forecast, supplier revenue, validation checks, and derived bit demand. bitDemand is HBM bits by SKU class + customer type (EB ranges, monthly refresh) — NOT a training-vs-inference split; dominant SKUs are dual-use, so that attribution would be dishonest. Current snapshots (specs, spot prices, market share, leading indicators) are free at full fidelity; the forward-looking series (revenueForecast, supplierRevenue, bitDemand) return a latest teaser for free/anonymous callers and the full time series for Pro — clamped with an explanatory note, never rejected.
Query Parameters
tableNarrow to one sub-table (accelerators, specs, marketShare, spotPrices, leadingIndicators, qualificationFeed, revenueForecast, supplierRevenue, validationChecks, bitDemand)?table=bitDemandExample Response
{
"success": true,
"data": {
"accelerators": [ ... ],
"specs": [ ... ],
"marketShare": [ ... ],
"spotPrices": [ ... ],
"leadingIndicators": [ ... ],
"qualificationFeed": [ ... ],
"revenueForecast": [ ... ],
"supplierRevenue": [ ... ],
"validationChecks": [ ... ],
"bitDemand": [{
"metric": "hbm_bits_sku_class",
"entity": "Blackwell",
"period": "2026",
"value_text": "≈1.15–1.92 EB (6–10M units × 192–384 GB/unit)",
"value_num": 1.54, "value_min": 1.15, "value_max": 1.92, "unit": "EB",
"observed_week": "2026-08-03", "as_of": "2026-01-01",
"confidence": "medium", "agreement": "strong", "independent_sources": 2,
"source_url": "https://...", "evidence": "Derived: public shipment-mix estimates × per-SKU HBM content...",
"provenance": { "last_updated": "...", "source_type": "derived", "confidence_tier": "medium", "dataset_version": "hbmData-v1.0" }
}]
},
"meta": { "source": "Silicon Analysts", "bitDemandNote": "bitDemand is NOT a workload split — ..." }
}/api/v1/articlesMetadata for 30+ semiconductor industry articles. Includes title, date, description, executive insight, key takeaways, cited sources, and full URL.
Query Parameters
limitReturn only the N most recent articles?limit=5qSearch in title and description (case-insensitive)?q=nvidiaExample Response
{
"success": true,
"data": [{
"slug": "nvidia-gpu-prices-double-...",
"title": "Nvidia GPU Prices Double as AI Demand...",
"date": "2026-01-23",
"description": "Analysis of Jensen Huang's comments...",
"insight": "The spillover of AI-driven demand...",
"keyTakeaways": ["...", "..."],
"url": "https://siliconanalysts.com/analysis/...",
"sources": [{ "publisher": "...", "title": "..." }]
}],
"meta": { "count": 30, "source": "Silicon Analysts" }
}/api/v1/market-pulseReal-time semiconductor market intelligence across 6 sectors: Logic, Memory, Packaging, Connectivity, Power, Geopolitics. Each headline includes trend direction, source, and impact analysis.
Query Parameters
categoryFilter by sector (logic, memory, packaging, connectivity, power, geopolitics)?category=memorytrendFilter by trend direction (up, down, neutral)?trend=uplimitMax items to return (1-50)?limit=5Example Response
{
"success": true,
"data": [{
"category": "Memory",
"headline": "HBM3e prices expected to increase 15-20%...",
"trend": "up",
"date": "Jan 2026",
"source": "Silicon Analysts Research",
"impact_analysis": "HBM demand continues to grow..."
}],
"meta": { "count": 12, "categories": ["Logic", "Memory", ...] }
}/api/v1/market-dataList all semiconductor market data datasets with metadata. Covers wafer pricing, HBM/DRAM pricing, CoWoS capacity, fab utilization, NRE costs, AI chip BOM, capex, lead times, NAND pricing, and cloud GPU pricing. Individual dataset endpoints (/api/v1/market-data/{id}) require Pro for full history.
Example Response
{
"success": true,
"data": [{
"id": "wafer-price-tsmc",
"name": "TSMC Wafer Price by Node",
"category": "Wafer Pricing",
"unit": "USD/wafer",
"description": "Estimated 300mm wafer prices...",
"proOnly": false
}, ...],
"meta": { "count": 14 }
}/api/v1/foundry/wafer-pricingCurrent wafer price ranges for 7 process nodes across TSMC, Samsung, and Intel. Includes defect density, NRE/mask set costs, and node maturity status with yield risk ratings.
Query Parameters
nodeFilter to a specific node (tsmc-n3, tsmc-n5, tsmc-n7, samsung-3nm, samsung-5nm, intel-16, tsmc-28)?node=tsmc-n3Example Response
{
"success": true,
"data": [{
"node": "tsmc-n3",
"label": "TSMC 3nm (N3)",
"waferCost": { "avg": 19500, "min": 17000, "max": 22000, "unit": "USD/wafer" },
"defectDensity": { "mature": 0.09, "early": 0.14, "unit": "defects/cm²" },
"nreCost": { "maskSetCost": 15000000, "totalNRE": 22000000, "unit": "USD" },
"maturity": { "status": "Ramping", "yieldRisk": "High" },
"source": "Analyst Reports, TrendForce, Morgan Stanley"
}],
"meta": { "count": 7, "updated": "2026-06-22" }
}/api/v1/foundry/economicsPer-foundry, per-process-node, per-fiscal-quarter wafer ASP (min/max/blended, USD per 300mm-equivalent wafer) and fab utilization (%), derived from public IR materials (earnings releases, transcripts, decks) via a documented scaling calculation (rev-mix-v1). Covers TSMC, UMC, Intel, Samsung, SMIC, GlobalFoundries. Every row carries source URLs, release dates, and a confidence tier; utilization is stated (the company said it) or derived (shipments vs capacity, capped medium) and never fabricated per node. The latest period per foundry is free; multi-period history (quarter/from/to) requires a Pro key — free callers are clamped to the latest period with an explanatory note, never rejected.
Query Parameters
foundrytsmc | umc | intel | samsung | smic | gf?foundry=tsmcnodeCanonical node token (n3, n5, n16-20, 22-28nm, 18a, ...)?node=n3node_groupCross-foundry bucket (leading_2nm, leading_3nm, class_5nm, class_7nm, class_10_22nm, mature_28nm_plus)?node_group=leading_3nmquarterExact period, YYYYQn or YYYYFY (Pro)?quarter=2026Q1from / toInclusive period range (Pro)?from=2024Q1&to=2026Q1include_factsAlso return the underlying published IR evidence facts (verbatim quote + source per datum)?include_facts=trueExample Response
{
"success": true,
"data": {
"foundries": [{
"foundry": "tsmc",
"fiscal_quarter": "2026Q1",
"fiscal_note": null,
"utilization": { "pct": 93.8, "basis": "derived", "range": { "min": null, "max": null }, "confidence": "medium" },
"blended_asp_usd": { "value": 8500, "basis": "derived_mix", "confidence": "high" },
"source_urls": ["https://investor.tsmc.com/english/quarterly-results/2026/q1"],
"release_dates": ["2026-04-16"],
"nodes": [{
"node": "n3",
"node_label": "3nm (N3)",
"node_group": "leading_3nm",
"wafer_asp_usd": { "min": 18000, "max": 22000, "blended": 20000 },
"asp_basis": "derived_mix",
"revenue_share_pct": 25,
"utilization": null,
"confidence": "medium",
"source_urls": ["https://investor.tsmc.com/english/quarterly-results/2026/q1"],
"release_dates": ["2026-04-16"],
"derivation": { "method_version": "rev-mix-v1", "derived_at": "2026-07-13T14:31:02Z" },
"provenance": { "last_updated": "2026-07-13T14:31:02Z", "source_type": "derived", "confidence_tier": "medium", "dataset_version": "foundry-economics-v1" }
}]
}],
"quarters_returned": ["2026Q1"],
"truncated": false
},
"meta": { "methodology": "Scaling calculation over public IR statements...", "history_access": "Latest period free; history requires Pro", "count": 1 }
}/api/v1/foundry/packaging-costsAdvanced semiconductor packaging cost benchmarks and technology capabilities for 14+ packaging types (CoWoS-S, CoWoS-L, EMIB, SoIC, InFO-PoP, FC-BGA, and the pilot-stage CoPoS panel-level entry — capabilities/notes only, no $ benchmark until public pricing exists). Also returns HBM memory specs and per-stack costs across generations.
Query Parameters
typeFilter by packaging type (cowos, cowos-l, emib, soic, info-pop, fc-bga, fc-csp, etc.)?type=cowosExample Response
{
"success": true,
"data": {
"packaging": [{
"id": "cowos",
"name": "CoWoS-S (2.5D)",
"description": "Silicon Interposer. Standard for high-end chips.",
"category": "hpc-ai",
"costBenchmark": { "cost": 600, "unit": "USD/package", "costRange": { "min": 600, "max": 900 } },
"capabilities": { "interposerActive": true, "stacking": false, ... }
}],
"hbmSpecs": [{
"type": "HBM3e",
"bandwidth": "1.2 TB/s",
"capacity": "36 GB",
"costPerStack": 300,
"unit": "USD/stack"
}]
},
"meta": { "packagingCount": 14, "hbmSpecCount": 5 }
}/api/v1/allocationCurrent allocation snapshot + optional time-series history for foundry nodes and advanced packaging (TSMC, Samsung, Intel × N2, N3, CoWoS-S, CoWoS-L, SoIC). Shows what is booked vs available, lead-time weeks, utilization, price trend, geo risk, and publicly-reported customer allocation shares. Every record carries provenance (source type, confidence tier, last updated). Sourced public estimates, human-reviewed. The current snapshot is free; the time-series history (include_history=true) requires a Pro key — free/anonymous callers get the snapshot only, with an explanatory note, never rejected.
Query Parameters
foundryFilter by foundry (case-insensitive)?foundry=TSMCnodeFilter by node/technology (substring: n2, n3, cowos-l, soic, …)?node=cowos-lcategoryleading_edge | advanced | mature | packaging | hbm?category=packagingcustomerFilter to nodes/readings involving a customer (substring)?customer=NVIDIAinclude_historyInclude the time-series history array?include_history=truehistory_metricNarrow history (lead_time, pct_locked, customer_allocation, cowos_capacity, foundry_utilization)?history_metric=lead_timeExample Response
{
"success": true,
"data": {
"current": [{
"id": "tsmc-n2",
"foundry": "TSMC",
"node": "N2 / A16",
"allocation_status": "fully_booked",
"lead_time_weeks_min": 78,
"lead_time_weeks_max": 156,
"lead_time_trend": "stable",
"price_trend": "rising",
"customers": ["Apple", "AMD", "MediaTek", "Qualcomm"],
"customer_shares": [{ "customer": "Lead mobile customer (public est.)", "share": 50 }],
"latest_signal": {
"metric": "pct_locked",
"value_text": "production schedule largely booked through late 2026",
"as_of": "2026-06-01", "observed_week": "2026-06-29", "confidence": "medium"
},
"provenance": {
"last_updated": "2026-06-15",
"source_type": "research",
"confidence_tier": "medium",
"dataset_version": "allocation-v1"
}
}],
"history": [{
"metric": "pct_locked", "entity": "TSMC CoWoS", "node": "CoWoS-L",
"value_text": ">85%", "value_num": 85, "unit": "%",
"observed_week": "2026-06-15", "agreement": "strong",
"independent_sources": 2,
"provenance": { "confidence_tier": "medium", "dataset_version": "allocation-v1" }
}]
},
"meta": { "snapshot_source": "table", "current_count": 13, "history_count": 11, "signals_current_through": "2026-06-29" }
}/api/v1/calculate/chip-costCalculate manufacturing cost breakdown for a custom chip design. Provide die dimensions and process node to get yield analysis, cost per die, packaging, and ASP estimates.
Request Body (JSON)
dieWidthnumber *Die width in mmdieHeightnumber *Die height in mmprocessNodestring *Process node (e.g., "7nm", "5nm", "28nm")waferCostnumberOverride wafer cost in USDpackagingTypestringPackaging type (e.g., "Flip-Chip BGA")packagingCostnumberOverride packaging cost in USDhbmStacksnumberNumber of HBM stacks (0-8)hbmCostnumberOverride per-stack HBM cost in USDtestCostnumberOverride test cost in USDvolumenumberAnnual production volumemarginTargetnumberTarget gross margin (0-1)energyRegionstringOpt-in manufacturing-energy adder: fab region for electricity pricing (texas, ohio, arizona, china, korea, taiwan, germany). Adds a conditional `energy` block — SA estimate, scenario delta (wafer price already embeds foundry energy)energyFacilityOverheadbooleanApply the ~1.75× facility-overhead multiplier to the energy adder (default true; only meaningful with energyRegion)substratestringPackaging substrate SCENARIO (default no-op): wafer-300mm | panel-310x310. Panel applies the midpoint of Yole's realistic 20–30% CoPoS savings band to the packaging cost only — silicon GDPW unchanged. SA scenario; TSMC CoPoS pilot ~Jun 2026, MP 2028–29.kgdTestCoveragenumberKnown-Good-Die pre-bond test coverage % (0–100). Returns a kgdScenario block: per-die test cost at this coverage vs. the packaged-defect waste it avoids, effective KGD quality, and the cost-minimizing coverage. Informational — never changes the headline cost. SA scenario.Example Response
{
"success": true,
"data": {
"estimatedChipCost": 1004.57,
"dieArea": 806,
"grossDiesPerWafer": 67,
"frontendYield": 56.32,
"totalYield": 55.19,
"costBreakdown": {
"waferCostPerGoodDie": 500.28,
"packagingAndTestCost": 2,
"hbmCost": 0,
"marginCost": 502.28
},
"inputs": {
"dieWidth": 26,
"dieHeight": 31,
"processNode": "tsmc-n5",
"waferCost": 18500,
"packagingType": "flip-chip",
"hbmStacks": 0,
"marginTarget": 50
}
},
"meta": { "source": "Silicon Analysts", "apiVersion": "1" }
}/api/v1/calculate/lead-timeHeuristic chip manufacturing lead-time estimation: MANUFACTURING CYCLE TIME (wafer fab + packaging assembly/test) as a min/max band in weeks. Mask layers × utilization-scaled days-per-mask-layer (FabTime operating-curve shape) + a packaging-class adder. EXCLUDES allocation/booking queue time — use /api/v1/allocation for booking windows.
Request Body (JSON)
maskLayersnumberTotal mask layers, integer 10–200. Required unless processNode is set (then defaults to the node-typical mask count)processNodestringNode ID for node-aware defaults: tsmc-n3 | tsmc-n5 | tsmc-n7 | tsmc-28 | samsung-3nm | samsung-5nm | intel-16. Supplies typical mask count + a DPML factorutilizationnumberFoundry utilization % (0–100). Omitted: defaults from live foundry-allocation data for the node (else a documented constant); the fired default is echoed in assumptions. ≤80% → best-case band; ≥95% → worst-case boundpackagingTypestringCoarse class conventional | flip-chip | cowos (default flip-chip), or any platform packaging id (fc-bga, wirebond-bga, cowos-l, copos, qfn, fowpl, 3d-stacking, ...)Example Response
{
"success": true,
"data": {
"fabDays": { "min": 104, "max": 137 },
"fabWeeks": { "min": 14.8, "max": 19.5 },
"packagingWeeks": { "min": 8, "max": 14 },
"totalWeeks": { "min": 22.8, "max": 33.5 },
"effectiveDpml": { "min": 1.092, "max": 1.438 },
"utilizationWeight": 1,
"inputs": {
"maskLayers": 95, "utilization": 98, "utilizationSource": "allocation_live",
"packagingType": "cowos", "packagingClass": "cowos",
"processNode": "tsmc-n3", "nodeDpmlFactor": 1.15
},
"assumptions": ["maskLayers defaulted to 95 (typical for TSMC 3nm (N3) ...)", "..."],
"methodology": "fabDays = maskLayers × effective DPML (days per mask layer). ...",
"sources": [{ "name": "Utilization operating curve", "citation": "FabTime Cycle Time Tutorial & Queueing Formulas (INFICON), 2023 ..." }],
"provenance": { "source_type": "computed", "confidence_tier": "low", "dataset_version": "leadTimeData-v1.0" }
},
"meta": { "source": "Silicon Analysts", "allocationCaveat": "Manufacturing cycle time only. Booking/allocation queue time is EXCLUDED ..." }
}/api/v1/market-advantageHuman-vetted proof that Silicon Analysts recorded a semiconductor supply-chain event before the first English-language coverage of it. Per win: our immutable first-seen timestamp, the cited source's publication time, the first English coverage's time + public URL/publisher, and the lead in hours. Only wins a human has confirmed for citation are returned — facts, not claims; empty until a win is confirmed.
Query Parameters
limitMax wins (1–100)?limit=25order_bylead_time (default) | recent?order_by=lead_timeevent_kindhbm_qual | capacity_signal | market_intelligence?event_kind=hbm_qualExample Response
{
"success": true,
"data": {
"wins": [{
"event_kind": "hbm_qual",
"event_ref": "SK Hynix|NVIDIA|HBM4|12-Hi",
"our_first_seen_at": "2026-07-01T09:12:00Z",
"english_first_seen_at": "2026-07-01T14:30:00Z",
"english_publisher": "Reuters",
"english_url": "https://...",
"lead_time_hours_vs_detection": 5.3,
"provenance": { "source_type": "derived", "confidence_tier": "high", "dataset_version": "market-advantage-v1" }
}],
"count": 1
},
"meta": { "citeAs": "Silicon Analysts — Market Advantage", "methodology": "https://siliconanalysts.com/data-quality#immutability" }
}/api/v1/schemaMachine-readable data dictionary: per-dataset point-in-time semantics — which timestamp is our first-seen vs the data's vintage, what mutates vs what is frozen, and how corrections work (append-only events, daily ledger, trigger-written history tables, archive + re-insert). Plus field docs, refresh cadences, and the endpoints/MCP tools serving each dataset. Built for data-engineering and DDQ reviewers.
Example Response
{
"success": true,
"data": {
"version": "data-dictionary-v1",
"pit_classes": { "append_only_event": "Rows never change; the table is its own complete history.", ... },
"sourcing_policy": "Public sources only — no insider data. ...",
"datasets": [{
"id": "hbm_qualification_events",
"pit_class": "append_only_event",
"first_seen_field": "detected_at",
"vintage_field": "as_of",
"correction_policy": "Append-only; a wrong event is superseded by a later event...",
"fields": [ ... ]
}]
}
}/api/v1/snapshotThe full frozen state of every published metric on a given day — "what did the feed say on date D?" Serves the newest ledger day at/before the requested date and reports both dates honestly. The ledger is append-only from 2026-06-06: days are never edited or backfilled, which is exactly what makes it backtest-grade. Requires a Pro API key or Pro session.
Query Parameters
dateYYYY-MM-DD (default today). Served day = newest snapshot at/before this date.?date=2026-06-20domainFilter to one ledger domain (wafer_pricing, chip_cost, margin_benchmark, foundry_capacity, defect_density, nre_cost, hbm_spot_price, hbm_leading_indicator, hbm_market_share, hbm_revenue_forecast, hbm_supplier_revenue)?domain=wafer_pricinglimitMax rows (1–2000; truncated flag reports overflow)?limit=500Example Response
{
"success": true,
"data": {
"date_requested": "2026-06-20",
"date_served": "2026-06-20",
"ledger_start": "2026-06-06",
"domain": "wafer_pricing",
"rows": [{
"domain": "wafer_pricing", "entity_id": "tsmc-n3", "metric": "avg",
"value_num": 19500, "unit": "usd_per_wafer",
"captured_at": "2026-06-20T08:00:12.412Z"
}],
"count": 45, "truncated": false
}
}/api/v1/exportDownload the dated append-only history of a series as JSONL (default) or CSV — one HTTP call, no pagination gymnastics. Datasets: any daily-ledger domain, the HBM qualification event timeline, or the published capacity-signal series. Bounded at 10,000 rows with an explicit truncated flag (X-Truncated header + JSONL _meta line); narrow with from/to to page longer histories. Requires a Pro API key or Pro session.
Query Parameters
datasetRequired: a ledger domain (e.g. wafer_pricing, chip_cost) or hbm_qualification_events | capacity_signals?dataset=hbm_qualification_eventsfromInclusive start date (YYYY-MM-DD)&from=2026-06-06toInclusive end date (YYYY-MM-DD)&to=2026-07-01formatjsonl (default) | csv&format=csvExample Response
{"_meta":{"dataset":"hbm_qualification_events","count":214,"truncated":false,"time_axis":"detected_at","note":"Append-only history export."}}
{"detected_at":"2026-06-14T09:02:11.000Z","relationship":"SK Hynix|NVIDIA|HBM4|12-Hi","new_status":"qualified","as_of":"2026-06-13","source_url":"https://...","confidence":"high"}
{"detected_at":"2026-06-16T09:01:47.000Z","relationship":"Samsung|NVIDIA|HBM4|12-Hi","new_status":"in_qualification"}Authentication & Rate Limits
All endpoints accept API keys for higher rate limits and authenticated usage tracking. Anonymous IP-based access works for real use of current data (20 GET req/day, 10 POST calculate req/day). Historical / time-series data requires a free API key — a key raises limits, unlocks a history preview, and attributes usage to your account.
Generate a free API key below for higher rate limits (100 req/day) and a history preview. Pro keys unlock 10,000 req/hr and the full time series. Include your key in requests via header:
# API key via X-API-Key header
curl -H "X-API-Key: sa_live_abc123..." https://siliconanalysts.com/api/v1/accelerators
# Or via Authorization header
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer sa_live_abc123..." https://siliconanalysts.com/api/v1/hbm| Tier | GET Endpoints | POST Calculate | History depth | Auth |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonymous (no key) | 20 req/day | 10 req/day | Current only | None required |
| Free API key | 100 req/day | 20 req/day | Preview (latest ~3 pts / 30d) | X-API-Key header |
| Pro API key | 10,000 req/hr | 10,000 req/hr | Full series + export | X-API-Key header |
Your API Keys
Sign in to generate API keys for higher rate limits and usage tracking.
API Playground
Try any endpoint live. No authentication required for read endpoints.
Try endpoints with live data — no API key required for public endpoints.
Need higher rate limits, webhook alerts, or bulk data access?
Pro API access is coming soon — higher rate limits, webhook alerts for price movements, and priority support. Join the waitlist and we'll reach out before launch.
AI Agent Discovery
Silicon Analysts is optimized for discovery by AI agents and LLM-powered search.
/llms.txt — Machine-readable site description for LLM agents/api/v1 — JSON API manifest for programmatic endpoint discovery/sitemap.xml — Full sitemap with all tools and articlesTrust & Reliability
Data Sources
Cost estimates are derived from Epoch AI Monte Carlo models, Raymond James semiconductor research, TrendForce quarterly reports, and SemiAnalysis teardown data.
HBM market data is sourced from SK Hynix, Samsung, and Micron investor relations, TrendForce, and proprietary supply chain tracking models.
Estimates are directional and may vary ±15-20% from actual manufacturing costs. Per-record provenance, source-type taxonomy, and confidence tiers are documented at /data-quality. For full terms see Terms & Data Provenance.
Explore Interactive Tools
Use our interactive tools to model chip costs, compare accelerators, and analyze markets